When a casino says its slots are “tested” or shows a lab seal on the footer, it is pointing to a real compliance process — but the value of that claim depends on who did the testing, under which rules, and how recently the game was checked. In 2026, serious markets expect independent assessment of randomness, payout behaviour, and system controls, plus ongoing re-testing when games or back-end systems change. This article explains what laboratories actually verify, how live dealer studios are inspected, and how to read certificates without over-trusting them.
In regulated markets, game testing is usually performed by independent test houses or accredited laboratories. Their job is not to “approve” a casino in a general sense, but to assess whether specific games and related systems meet the technical rules of a given jurisdiction. This detail matters: a certificate is only meaningful in the context of the rules it tested against, because technical requirements differ from one regulator to another.
Accreditation is another layer. Many reputable labs operate under ISO/IEC 17025, a standard focused on laboratory competence (methods, measurement, quality controls, impartiality, and traceability of results). ISO/IEC 17025 does not “certify” a slot as fair by itself; it indicates the lab is assessed as competent to perform defined testing activities. You still need to see what the lab tested and what it did not test.
Regulators may also publish or recognise lists of approved auditors or service providers that licence holders can use. A name tied to a regulator-controlled process is usually a stronger signal than a generic badge graphic on a casino site, because it connects the lab to a formal oversight framework.
Some labs are widely referenced internationally because they test for multiple jurisdictions and describe their services publicly. In practical terms, RNG-focused testing typically involves evaluating the randomness source, verifying that outcomes match the game’s published maths model, and checking that the surrounding system does not bias results.
Other organisations focus on broader compliance and operational controls. In those cases, the “seal” concept is often linked to a set of internal standards plus periodic audits. For live dealer games, audits normally extend beyond software: they can include studio procedures, equipment controls, logging, and dispute handling.
You may also encounter labs that position themselves as accredited specialists for online gaming certification and quality assurance. As with any lab, the key question remains the same: is the certificate linked to a specific jurisdiction and a specific game version, and does it describe scope, methods, and dates in a way that can be verified?
A thorough slot audit typically checks the RNG and the game maths model together. The RNG must behave as expected statistically, but the practical integrity test is whether RNG outputs are used correctly by the game code and whether results match the certified reel and feature logic. Labs also confirm that the published RTP corresponds to the configured model and that the game behaves consistently across states (base game, bonus features, free spins, respins, and error handling).
Good testing also examines the surrounding system controls: how configuration is locked, how builds are versioned, and what change management looks like. That matters because modern game releases change frequently — and even a small update can require re-testing if it affects certified components, even when the player-facing design looks identical.
What these audits do not guarantee is player profitability or “better odds” in a practical sense. A certificate cannot protect you from house edge, short-term variance, or the fact that two games with the same RTP can feel very different due to volatility. It also does not replace wider licensing oversight on topics like dispute resolution, responsible gambling tools, or anti-money laundering controls, which sit outside pure game maths.
Start with scope. A credible report or certificate should state what was tested: RNG, RTP/maths, game rules, back-end integration, or specific jurisdictional requirements. If you only see a logo with no report number, date, or test scope, treat it as marketing until proven otherwise. Where possible, verify details on the lab’s own site or through a regulator’s published information rather than trusting an image hosted by the casino.
Next, check the versioning. A meaningful certificate is tied to a specific build or version identifier and, ideally, a clear version string or comparable reference. If a casino cannot tell you which version is certified, you cannot know whether the document matches what you are playing.
Finally, check the timing and re-test triggers. Even “minor” changes can matter if they touch RNG usage, payout logic, jackpot integrations, wallet settlement, or server-side configuration that influences outcomes. The most reliable operators treat certification as an ongoing process: controlled releases, documented change management, and targeted re-tests after changes.

Live dealer games add a physical layer: cards, wheels, shuffling equipment, studio security, and broadcast integrity. That means audits often include on-site inspection of the studio, reviews of dealing procedures, controls over equipment, logging of incidents, and how disputes are investigated. The scope is broader than for a slot because fairness depends on people, processes, and physical controls as much as code.
Integrity controls in live environments are procedural as well as technical. For blackjack, that can include how decks are introduced, how shuffles are performed, how cut cards are used, and how replacements are documented. For roulette, it can include wheel maintenance routines, checks for physical wear, table change controls, and camera coverage sufficient to reconstruct an outcome if a dispute occurs.
Broadcast and data integrity are also central in 2026. Even if dealing is correct, the player experience depends on reliable video feeds, synchronised game state, and accurate settlement. Audits may assess resilience to dropouts, latency handling, audit trails, and whether game history and dispute records can be produced quickly and consistently.
“Certified” in live dealer contexts usually means a studio and its procedures have been assessed against a defined checklist and that controls meet the targeted market’s requirements. It does not mean every hand is supervised in real time by the lab. Instead, it points to a controls framework: documented processes, periodic audits, and the ability to investigate complaints using preserved evidence.
As a player, you can still do sensible verification. Look for clear studio identification (not just the casino brand), accessible game rules, visible game history, and a dispute route that references the licence holder and regulator. If a site shows a lab seal, try to confirm it through the lab’s official information or through regulator materials that explain how testing and auditing are handled.
Also watch for red flags that a certificate is being used loosely: seals with no date, certificates that do not specify jurisdiction, documents that refer to a different brand, or language that promises outcomes rather than describing controls. A trustworthy operator is usually comfortable explaining which lab tested which games, when, and under which rules — because those are standard compliance questions.